United Parcel Service UPS
21 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Ditzingen 1
23.07.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Not recommendable employer.
Fechenheim 2
28.11.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Fechenheim 3
28.11.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Fair payments. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Herford 4
28.07.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Herne 5
29.09.2022
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 6
13.02.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 7
24.10.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 8
08.11.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 9
23.10.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 10
28.07.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 11
13.04.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 12
24.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 13
12.03.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 14
02.08.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. First class salary. Good future prospects. Excellent employer.
Cologne 15
09.02.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Neuss 16
27.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Impeccable Leadership. Interesting tasks. First class salary. Recommendable workplace.
Neuss 17
27.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Filling employment. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Neuss 18
19.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Average recognition. Not recommendable employer.
Neuss 19
10.04.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Employers with criticisms.
Neuss 20
26.09.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Ulm 21
30.05.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
